The Heirlooms of DNA
Nov. 13th, 2007 08:24 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(typed fast into the comment box.)
I have recently read and/or seen several reports (print and TV) about people investigating their genetic heritage and being startled by the results. This amuses me, in a fond way.
I guess what amuses me most are the surprise and bemusement from people who are Black and find they have White ancestors and relatives or vice versa. (OK, especially vice versa.) I could try to say something inspiring about how we are all related, one great human family, but my heart's not really in that message of togetherness right at the moment.
Instead, I'm looking at the coffee-with-a-spoon-of-milk tone of my arm and my face in this userpic, and thinking of my grandfather who prided himself on (supposedly) being of pure-blooded African ancestry, my caramel-colored grandmother, and how much darker anyone I've ever met from West Africa is than I am. I've had people debate with me over whether I have any European ancestors; if I ever have the money maybe I'll go in for one of these tests and see, but what would surprise me would be if I didn't. One way of looking at one's ancestry is to divide it into phases across time; one of the phases my ancestry passed through was being slaves in the New World, which all but guarantees that I have some masters and overseers in my ancestry as well. That's what people with power do to the powerless, after all.
(And no, I don't think that's shameful to relate. I'm proud of my ancestors for surviving that and a million other indignities, and I'm grateful to them since if they hadn't I and the rest of my family wouldn't be here.)
These ethnohistorical suppositions of mine have been borne out by genetic studies of various Black populations in the Western Hemisphere (frex, researchers have found high incidences of mDNA from Africa and Y-chromosome markers from Europe) and are showing up in people's lives now as they research their genetic history. To say nothing of more recent dramas in people's ancestry; humans lie and have secrets and secret affairs and "pass" and all sorts of things. One article noted how its author had been told his family had Native American ancestry and not only did that turn out not to be true he found that they had Black ancestry, and on reading that I found myself wondering about/making up two sisters, daughters of a slave, and how one was light-skinned enough to say she was part Indian and part White so she did, and the other "looked Black", and their great-great-great grandchildren finding each other through one of these genetic geneaology programs in the modern day, one a White woman and one a Black one. But then I don't have to theorize that, when that very event has been happening and has been the subject of some of the articles I've read and news segments I've seen.
If one genetic lineage can contain people of two or more racial groups, what does that say about the very concept of race?
I have recently read and/or seen several reports (print and TV) about people investigating their genetic heritage and being startled by the results. This amuses me, in a fond way.
I guess what amuses me most are the surprise and bemusement from people who are Black and find they have White ancestors and relatives or vice versa. (OK, especially vice versa.) I could try to say something inspiring about how we are all related, one great human family, but my heart's not really in that message of togetherness right at the moment.
Instead, I'm looking at the coffee-with-a-spoon-of-milk tone of my arm and my face in this userpic, and thinking of my grandfather who prided himself on (supposedly) being of pure-blooded African ancestry, my caramel-colored grandmother, and how much darker anyone I've ever met from West Africa is than I am. I've had people debate with me over whether I have any European ancestors; if I ever have the money maybe I'll go in for one of these tests and see, but what would surprise me would be if I didn't. One way of looking at one's ancestry is to divide it into phases across time; one of the phases my ancestry passed through was being slaves in the New World, which all but guarantees that I have some masters and overseers in my ancestry as well. That's what people with power do to the powerless, after all.
(And no, I don't think that's shameful to relate. I'm proud of my ancestors for surviving that and a million other indignities, and I'm grateful to them since if they hadn't I and the rest of my family wouldn't be here.)
These ethnohistorical suppositions of mine have been borne out by genetic studies of various Black populations in the Western Hemisphere (frex, researchers have found high incidences of mDNA from Africa and Y-chromosome markers from Europe) and are showing up in people's lives now as they research their genetic history. To say nothing of more recent dramas in people's ancestry; humans lie and have secrets and secret affairs and "pass" and all sorts of things. One article noted how its author had been told his family had Native American ancestry and not only did that turn out not to be true he found that they had Black ancestry, and on reading that I found myself wondering about/making up two sisters, daughters of a slave, and how one was light-skinned enough to say she was part Indian and part White so she did, and the other "looked Black", and their great-great-great grandchildren finding each other through one of these genetic geneaology programs in the modern day, one a White woman and one a Black one. But then I don't have to theorize that, when that very event has been happening and has been the subject of some of the articles I've read and news segments I've seen.
If one genetic lineage can contain people of two or more racial groups, what does that say about the very concept of race?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-13 02:13 pm (UTC)I have an ancestor from the 1840s who was this beautiful, rich French orphan from New Orleans. I wouldn't mind getting a DNA test to confirm my speculations on the subject.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:27 pm (UTC)You'd think people would know this... it's really odd, how people think of race and ethnicity as these monolithic things.
I wish I could ask my grandfather more about his ancestry.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-13 02:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-13 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:29 pm (UTC)You would not believe how hard I laughed when I heard that. :)
she's a distant cousin of the first African-American to be elected to the US Congress in the 20th century. (Oscar Stanton De Priest)
Oh, that's SO cool!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:39 pm (UTC)As for Paula and the De Priest connection, I think it's cool too. He's a distant cousin to be proud of, that's for sure. (She's also related to that poor Welch girl who married that transplanted yankee. But we don't generally mention that in polite company.)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-13 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-13 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-14 02:36 pm (UTC)And just to add to the mystery: the family legend was that when he first brought her home, his family refused to give their blessings to the match because, well, Beatrice Harris? with red hair and blue eyes and very fair skin? obviously she was Irish! and on the other hand her family looked at his dark olive skin and eyes and black hair and figured he was probably Italian. So they eloped.
Now, of course, I wonder whether there was any truth to the story at all...
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:33 pm (UTC)True or half true or not so true, it's a grand story. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:32 pm (UTC)I'm glad that in the end you know your family's heritage. :)
*uses thinky icon*
Date: 2007-11-13 08:05 pm (UTC)So, thinky. We know race is a construct, and even the construct is a joke considering how blended we are (as the other commenters pointed out). I try to use it as a reminder that someone who grew up Black in the U.S. is going to have had different experiences than I did in my insular little redneck world. But then, I need to remind myself as well that everyone has had different experiences, because that's how life works, and that keeping those differences in mind is good for context, but the important part is what I've got in common with them.
*continues to make it All About Me*
*sucks*
*posts anyway*
Re: *uses thinky icon*
Date: 2007-11-15 03:34 pm (UTC)unfortunately
Date: 2007-11-13 08:42 pm (UTC)If there is one thing that DNA tests have shown it is that the concepts of race of the 20th century ( and before ) are meaningless.
If the genetic variance within any given 'race' is by far bigger that the differences between any two 'races' than race is not a usefull classification concept. Given the nasty ballast race has here ( in Germany ) and in the US the whole concept should be ditched. ( actually here it is pretty much - nobody would dare even inquire about racial background on a form ( not that this will help if looking for a job and/or a flat and/or a so - I am male wishy-washy white average tho discrimination is rarely against me, does not mean I do not notice it occasionally )
I suspect that even within the very limited scope where race makes some slight sense ( as a sorting criterion) US Americans tend to be more mixed than some Europeans - at that I suspect that rural communities are less 'mixed' than urban ares: let a remote village exist for a ccouple of hundred years off the main travel routes and everybody there is related to everybody.
On the other hand take a crossroads on several main traffic lines and the resultant locals WILL be mixed : http://www.gh4acws.de/zuckmeier_rhineland.html
Re: unfortunately
Date: 2007-11-15 03:37 pm (UTC)Oh, *so* true.
That monologue is *gorgeous* and inspiring (I'm going to add it to this entry in a comment). Thank you so much for sharing it with me!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-13 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-14 12:29 am (UTC)Though in America, you're more likely to get a mixed bag of what counts as 'important'. Oddly, in my family, few of my direct ancestors were nationally important (though there were a couple), but we have lots of famous uncles. (One of whom, oddly, was Oliver Cromwell... I'm not sure if that counts as being related to royalty or the antithesis of being related to royalty.)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-14 12:48 am (UTC)Seriously though, I'm happy with the current interest in genealogy, in part because I'm a historian, and in part because I would really like to know more about my ancestors. I grew up traveling and did not have the benefit of being around my extended family.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-14 01:09 am (UTC)It would be interesting to get the DNA work-up, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:46 pm (UTC)I so hear you. And honestly, so much of that being descended from royals happened much the same way all those European Y-chromosome markers got into the Western Hemisphere Black populations. Ah, people.
100% American indeed! *cheers* In all the wonderful diversity of heritage that so often implies.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-14 07:15 pm (UTC)(I remember a discussion I had with some of my friends about the fact that nine of my fingerprints are of a type almost unknown among Europeans but very common among Polynesians, and I have this one thumb with a European-type thumbprint. One of my Maori friends cracked up and said "that's your Pakeha thumb!")
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:49 pm (UTC)Amen!
Your Paheka thumb, hee! *giggles* A White friend told me a similar story about a comment made her by a Black former boyfriend of hers, about a particularly large and dark mole she has... I'll leave the rest of the story as an exercise for the reader.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:52 pm (UTC)"Monologue from a play / film „des Teufels General“ Carl Zuckmeyer
http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movies/movie.html?v_id=89371
"on lineage, and nobility and racial purity ( a fatherly peptalk to a young officer who has been picked on by hif 'fellow' (very prussian) officers because he did not have a lineage like them but a rather dubious grandmother of unknown provenance) "
Think - what may not have happened in an old family from the Rhine
- from the Rhine I say
the people-mill
the blending-vat of Europe
Now lets imagine your ancestors Since year one
There was a Roman centurion
A dark guy , brown like a ripe olive
Who taught a blond girl Latin .
And then a Jewish spice-merchant came into the family
an earnest man
Who became Christian before even marrying - and fonded the catholic familytradition
And a greek physician or a celtic legionary
A mercenary from Grisons, a Swedish horseman
A soldier from Napoleons army, a deserted cossack , a raftsman from the Blackforest
A wandering millers journeyman from Alsace
A fat Rhineskipper from the Netherlands
A Maygar, a Pandur, an officer from Vienna, a french gambler
A musician from Bohemia
They all lived on the banks of the Rhine, lived, scuffled, drank and sang
and fathered children and
And Goethe came from that melting pot and Beethoven
And Gutenberg and Mathias Grunewald and
Eh - look it up in the encyclopaedia
They were the Best, my dear, the best in the world
And Why?
Because there the people mixed
Mixed like the water from wells and brooks and creeks and small rivers
Flowing together to a great living river
From the Rhine, that means from the occident
That is natural nobility
That is 'race'
sorry to niggle
Date: 2007-11-15 09:15 pm (UTC)And the reason I wanted to quote it is that Cologne, my home, is very much on the Rhine - and on my fathers side we have been around these parts for about 400 years, so I presume I am mixed. And proud of it.