An Apology to Orcs
May. 3rd, 2013 11:13 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I feel kind of guilty towards orcs sometimes.
From a narrative perspective, whether reading or writing, it can be useful to have characters whose evilitude is pre-established. When reading or watching LOTR or The Hobbit, anytime orcs show up one knows they’re going to be bad news. In “Undaunted” I didn’t need to explain how or why Ori ended up in such a horrible situation, I just had to throw orcs at him.
And yet.
My conception of sentience (and orcs are obviously sentient) rebels against the notion of classifying any group as Always Chaotic Evil (as TV Tropes would put it), not least because in the society where I live I belong to a couple of groups that many people consider to be Always Chaotic Evil. And, because fiction is inextricably entangled with ‘Real’ life, I know that one common idea about Middle-Earth is that the orcs, along with the Southrons and Easterlings, are meant to be the People of Color there. But even without that sociopolitical reason, I would still be philosophically opposed to assuming that any group or lineage is automatically all bad, any more than they could be assumed to be all good. I feel like I should depict an orc or group who aren't bad guys.
I’m not sure where I’m going with this thought yet, since I don’t have any accompanying story ideas. I think I’m going to get a copy of Mary Gentle’s Grunts and see what comes to mind after I read that.
From a narrative perspective, whether reading or writing, it can be useful to have characters whose evilitude is pre-established. When reading or watching LOTR or The Hobbit, anytime orcs show up one knows they’re going to be bad news. In “Undaunted” I didn’t need to explain how or why Ori ended up in such a horrible situation, I just had to throw orcs at him.
And yet.
My conception of sentience (and orcs are obviously sentient) rebels against the notion of classifying any group as Always Chaotic Evil (as TV Tropes would put it), not least because in the society where I live I belong to a couple of groups that many people consider to be Always Chaotic Evil. And, because fiction is inextricably entangled with ‘Real’ life, I know that one common idea about Middle-Earth is that the orcs, along with the Southrons and Easterlings, are meant to be the People of Color there. But even without that sociopolitical reason, I would still be philosophically opposed to assuming that any group or lineage is automatically all bad, any more than they could be assumed to be all good. I feel like I should depict an orc or group who aren't bad guys.
I’m not sure where I’m going with this thought yet, since I don’t have any accompanying story ideas. I think I’m going to get a copy of Mary Gentle’s Grunts and see what comes to mind after I read that.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 03:38 pm (UTC)I read part of Grunts a few years ago, and maybe I should have stuck with it, but I didn't really care for the humor of the situation; I found it at once too parodic and too bleak. "Well these guys are just like other guys, it's HILARIOUS!" I would rather have a more serious treatment on the topic. Have you read Jacqueline Carey's Sundering Duology? It attempts to do something pretty similar, and it comes the closest to succeeding that I've found, though I also found the pseudo-Tolkienism more teeth-grating than most. (Maybe that's because I think Carey has a really beautiful voice of her own, and subsuming it to talk Tolkien, as it were, just felt really really wrong to me.)
So there. All my thinky thoughts. Hopefully not offensive ones.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-07 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 04:04 pm (UTC)Tolkien himself was disturbed by his Orcs, and didn't really know what to think about them; he needed them for the plot, of course, but being the world-builder that he was, he constantly worried himself about their origins and their fate. But we only know about that ambivalence because of HoMe and his Letters--none of it ever made its way into the Story.
I've seen stories in which there are "misfit" Orcs who don't quite fit in with the others (usually played for humor), and I've seen some stories that try to go "behind the scenes" a little. But none of them were very realistic, because we don't have enough detail to go on.
I have recently read a story, however, that gives us a teensy peek at some interesting possibilities: Orcling by
It's a childhood story of her OFC, who while on a camping trip with her father encounters an Orc child, and how they interact with one another.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 06:11 pm (UTC)Maybe you're right about that.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-07 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-07 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-07 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-07 06:46 pm (UTC)Goblin Hero (http://www.amazon.com/Goblin-Hero-Series-Jim-Hines/dp/0756404428/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1367952139&sr=8-1&keywords=Jim+C.+Hines+Goblin), in which Jig the Goblin makes a couple of new/old friends and continues the process of being a hero that he REALLY would rather not be.
Goblin War (http://www.amazon.com/Goblin-War-Series-Jim-Hines/dp/0756404932/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1367952139&sr=8-2&keywords=Jim+C.+Hines+Goblin), in which Jig, well, goes to war. And it sucks.
I <3 Jim (http://www.jimchines.com/blog/) anyway, because he's good people, but the Goblin books are kind of awesome for looking at a "traditional" quest from the Other's point of view. And, also, funny as hell if you're a Tabletop FRPG player. Or not -- my dad's never played an FRPG in his life and he loved them.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-13 05:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 06:37 pm (UTC)I do think it's problematic that they're presented as always-evil, but I tend to rationalize that with the knowledge that we're only seeing one side of the culture: their warriors. And whether they're all-evil, warriors of any enemy in a place where the land is disputed so attack is possible are all-dangerous.
It also helps to focus on those glimpses we get of something beyond pure evil, like the conversation Sam overhears about what the orcs want to do after the war, outside Shelob's lab, or again Sam's question about the Haradric boy he sees killed in Ithilien (I love that the movies gave that question to Faramir!), or the amnesty Aragorn offers to the people who had fought against Gondor and Rohan after the war. You see even more in the Silmarillion - it's obvious that most of the so-called evil men are being oppressed by "Servants of Morgoth" the Valar couldn't be bothered to deal with.
Not saying there aren't problems here, but this is one strategy I've found helpful to deal with the way orcs and other "evil" folk are presented in Tolkien.
no subject
Date: 2013-05-03 08:54 pm (UTC)Also, we can figure that the Haradrim and the Southrons have been deceived by the Enemy, much as the Dunlendings were. So that doesn't mean they are necessarily Evil, though as you say,they remain dangerous. And so long as they remain able to wage war they have to be dealt with as enemies.