browngirl: (Elphaba (gargoylekitty))
[personal profile] browngirl
I'm writing an unexpectedly difficult story, and one of the reasons it's difficult is that the pairing is fanonical; the characters don't interact in canon. I'm writing it because it's hot because I like fanonical pairings, for many of the same reasons I like introducing people in real life.

Long ago, I was a member of [livejournal.com profile] bdotp, a community devoted to pairings of any/all characters played by two actors who'd achieved stunning chemistry in one particular canon, and I was very charmed by how compatible so many of their characters could be made to be. In my current fannish obsession, with such a big cast, there are many offscreen interactions that can be surmised even though they don't happen onscreen, and I really like that about it.

What about you?

*gets back to writing*

Date: 2009-09-20 05:10 am (UTC)
ext_12164: ((un)dead het otp)
From: [identity profile] mrsfrankenstien.livejournal.com
I had an argument with a friend of mine about this, she was insisting that crossovers or characters who hadn't met in canon were necessarily crack pairings.

This icon's keywords are "(un)dead het otp," and they've never had any canon interaction at all. Or at least, not while they were both alive.

Date: 2009-09-20 09:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rubynye.livejournal.com
Yeah, I'm with you and not her. Crack is a different axis entirely from canonicity.

Also, your icon makes me nostalgic. To wit:

http://rubynye.livejournal.com/141747.html
Edited Date: 2009-09-20 09:44 pm (UTC)

Profile

browngirl: (Default)
browngirl

June 2017

S M T W T F S
    12 3
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 06:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios