ext_31587 ([identity profile] dan-ad-nauseam.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] browngirl 2009-03-06 06:55 am (UTC)

Frankly, I think the arguments that were advanced weren't very good. I think the California court was likely to accept a federal equal protection argument on the grounds that marriage was a fundamental right and that strict scrutiny would apply, instead of the various procedural arguments that were used. I know that would leave open the possibility of going to the Supremes, but I think Kennedy might buy that argument as well.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting