I guess ... I read it differently. My interpretation was that bringing up the VRA was going to harsh her squee precisely because what the SCOTUS did was so awful. Not that it's less important. But I don't want to argue because, like I said, I don't know her. I have no idea what she's really thinking. On my third read, I think her language was pretty harsh. (It "galls" her? Seriously?) So I could be wrong. And okay, we've had our day or two of celebration, so now it's time to get back to work.